Should the UK purchase Eurofighter over F35?

Should the UK purchase Eurofighter over F35?

With the strategic defence review due at any time, and with the UK retiring it’s tranche 1 Eurofighter Typhoons, the need to bolster front-line fast jet numbers has become even more important at a time of fragility in geopolitics. It’s almost a carbon copy of the 1930’s before WW2, when the UK was ill-equipped and under prepared for War. With low equipment numbers and personnel, the UK is heading for a showdown it can’t currently win. We can’t just rely on superior technology; we need mass as well. With the low numbers of both Typhoon and F35 in the RAF currently, we need to accelerate a plan to purchase more of either or both of these aircraft.

The decision between purchasing the Eurofighter Typhoon and the F-35 Lightning II is a complex one, with a range of factors to consider. Both aircraft have strengths, but they also have different capabilities and strategic implications. Here's an overview of the key points:

Eurofighter Typhoon

Pros:

Established and Proven in Service: The Eurofighter has been in service for a while, and many air forces (including the UK) already operate it. It’s a well-understood platform with a solid track record.
Air Superiority: The Typhoon is designed for air-to-air combat, with excellent agility, speed, and a high degree of manoeuvrability. It excels in controlling the skies.
Multi-Role Capability: While it’s primarily a fighter, the Typhoon can be adapted for ground attack missions, reconnaissance, and other roles with upgrades.
Operational Flexibility: Being a European project, the Typhoon’s components and maintenance facilities are widely available, which could provide more operational flexibility within NATO and European contexts.

Cons:

Limited Stealth: The Typhoon lacks significant stealth capabilities compared to the F-35, making it more vulnerable to modern radar systems in highly contested environments.
Less Advanced Sensor Fusion: The Typhoon doesn’t have the same level of integrated systems and sensor fusion as the F-35, which gives the latter a technological edge in networked warfare.
Airframe Design: While excellent in air superiority, the Typhoon is not as capable as the F-35 in strike missions or operating in contested environments with modern anti-air defences.

F-35 Lightning II

Pros:

Stealth and Low Observability: The F-35’s stealth capabilities are a huge advantage, allowing it to operate in highly contested airspace where traditional aircraft might be vulnerable.
Advanced Sensor Fusion: The F-35 integrates its sensors (radar, infrared, and others) into a unified system, providing unparalleled situational awareness. This is crucial in modern combat, where understanding the battlespace is as important as firepower.
Multi-Role Capability: The F-35 is designed for a wide range of roles—air-to-air, air-to-ground, electronic warfare, intelligence gathering, and more. This flexibility is enhanced by its ability to operate from a variety of platforms, including aircraft carriers.
Future-Proof: The F-35 is part of a larger, long-term program with continual updates, ensuring it stays relevant in future conflicts. It also operates in a joint, networked environment, which improves interoperability with NATO allies.

Cons:

Cost: The F-35 is considerably more expensive than the Eurofighter, both in terms of acquisition and maintenance. This has been a significant issue for many countries.
Reliability and Development Delays: The F-35 program has faced development challenges, including delays and issues with certain systems. While it’s generally considered reliable now, the early stages of the program had more teething problems.
Less Agile in Dogfights: While the F-35 is highly capable in many areas, it doesn’t match the agility of the Eurofighter in close-quarters dogfighting. However, modern air combat is shifting away from traditional dogfights to networked, missile-based engagements.

Strategic Considerations for the UK

Interoperability with Allies: The UK is part of NATO and has strong ties to the US. The F-35 is already in service with a number of NATO allies, which could make integration into multinational operations smoother.
Future Threats: The F-35 is designed with future threats in mind, particularly advanced air defence systems and peer adversaries like Russia and China. Its stealth and sensor capabilities are vital for countering these threats.
Economic Considerations: The Eurofighter is cheaper in terms of procurement and potentially operational costs. The UK MOD may prefer to invest in a greater number of Typhoons for air defence, especially with budget constraints.
Carrier Operations: The Royal Navy operates the F-35B variant (short take-off and landing), which is designed for use on aircraft carriers. If the MOD seeks to maintain a powerful carrier strike capability, the F-35 is essential.

Conclusion

If the UK prioritises air superiority, cost-effectiveness, and a well-proven aircraft for its current needs, the Eurofighter Typhoon might be the better choice.

If the MOD is looking towards future-proofing its air fleet, emphasising stealth, multirole capabilities, sensor fusion, and interoperability with allies, the F-35 would be the more strategic option.

Ultimately, both aircraft serve different purposes, and the MOD may choose to operate both, as it already does with the F-35B and Eurofighter. However, if a new purchase decision is on the table, the UK's specific operational needs, budget, and long-term defence strategy will determine the best choice.

Cirrus Selection Insights